TVS iQube S vs Bajaj Chetak 3501 — Konsa Lena Chahiye?
Electric scooters in the ₹1.3–1.5 lakh segment have become seriously competitive, and two names that consistently come up are the TVS iQube S and the Bajaj Chetak 3501.
On paper, both look quite similar—same battery size, similar pricing, and urban-focused performance. But once you dig deeper, the differences start to matter depending on how you actually plan to use your scooter.
Price & Positioning
The TVS iQube S 3.5 kWh is priced at ₹1.40 lakh, while the Bajaj Chetak 3501 comes in slightly lower at ₹1.34 lakh (both ex-showroom).
The price gap isn’t big enough to be a deciding factor. In my view, this comparison is less about cost and more about what kind of riding experience you prefer.
Battery, Range & Charging
Both scooters come with a 3.5 kWh battery, which keeps things evenly matched at a basic level.
The iQube S offers a claimed range of 145 km, while the Chetak 3501 pushes slightly higher with 153 km claimed range. In real-world usage, that difference is unlikely to be dramatic.
Where the Chetak clearly pulls ahead is charging. It can go from 0 to 80% in about 3 hours, whereas the iQube takes closer to 4 to 4.5 hours for the same.
From a practical standpoint, I find faster charging more useful than a small range difference, especially if you don’t charge overnight every day.
Performance & Ride Experience
The iQube S has a 4.4 kW peak motor and a top speed of 78 km/h, along with a 0–40 km/h time of 4.2 seconds. The Chetak 3501, on the other hand, produces around 4.2 kW peak power and tops out at 73 km/h.
This translates into a noticeable difference on the road.
The iQube feels quicker off the line and more responsive in traffic, which I personally prefer for city riding. The Chetak is smoother and more relaxed, but it doesn’t feel as eager.
If your daily ride involves weaving through traffic, the iQube’s extra punch makes a difference.
Features & Technology
This is where the iQube leans heavily into its strengths.
It gets a large 7-inch TFT display, navigation, and over 100 connected features, including alerts and app integration. It also offers Q-Park Assist, which includes forward and reverse movement—something that’s genuinely useful in tight parking spots.
The Chetak 3501 comes with a 5-inch TFT touchscreen, Bluetooth connectivity, navigation, and features like keyless riding, hill hold, and reverse mode (via TecPac).
In my opinion, the iQube feels more like a tech-loaded modern EV, while the Chetak keeps things simpler but still practical.
Storage & Everyday Practicality
This is one area where the Chetak stands out clearly.
It offers 35 liters of under-seat storage along with a 5-liter front glove box, making it far more usable for carrying daily items.
The iQube S provides up to 32 liters of under-seat storage, which is good, but it doesn’t match the versatility of the Chetak.
For everyday errands, grocery runs, or office commutes, I find extra storage surprisingly valuable, and here the Chetak has a real edge.
Build Quality & Design
The design philosophies of these two scooters are completely different.
The iQube goes for a modern, functional design, with a lighter feel and more conventional materials.
The Chetak, on the other hand, features a solid all-metal body, which gives it a more premium and durable feel. It also carries a classic design language that appeals to a lot of buyers.
Personally, the Chetak feels more solid and premium, while the iQube feels more practical and contemporary.
Comfort & Ride Quality
Both scooters are comfortable enough for daily commuting.
The iQube’s suspension setup tends to handle rough roads slightly better, making it feel a bit more forgiving over bumps.
The Chetak feels more planted and stable, especially at steady speeds, but isn’t quite as plush over bad roads.
Safety & Reliability
Both scooters come with IP67-rated battery protection, disc and drum braking setups, and connected safety features.
However, one important real-world factor is service reach. TVS generally has a wider service network, which could make ownership easier depending on your city.
Final Verdict — Konsa Lena Chahiye?
If you want better performance, more features, and a tech-forward experience, the iQube S is the stronger choice.
If your priority is practicality, premium build quality, and faster charging, the Chetak 3501 makes more sense.
My Personal Take
If I had to choose for myself, I’d lean towards the iQube S.
The extra performance and feature set make it feel more aligned with what an electric scooter should offer today. But at the same time, I can’t ignore how well-rounded the Chetak is—especially for someone who values storage, simplicity, and solid build quality.
Frequently Asked Questions — FAQs
Q. Which scooter is better for daily commuting?
- Both are good, but the iQube S feels better in traffic, while the Chetak is more relaxed and practical.
Q. Which one charges faster?
- The Bajaj Chetak 3501 charges faster, reaching 80% in about 3 hours.
Q. Which scooter offers better performance?
- The TVS iQube S delivers better acceleration and higher top speed.
Q. Which has more storage?
- The Chetak 3501 offers more storage, including a front glove box.
Q. Which is more premium?
- The Chetak feels more premium due to its metal body, while the iQube focuses on modern design.
Q. Which one should I buy?
- Choose the iQube S for performance and tech, and the Chetak 3501 for practicality and build quality.
