India’s electric scooter market is seeing fierce competition, and the Bajaj Chetak 3503 and TVS iQube 3.4 kWh are two noteworthy contenders. Both are designed for urban commuters, but each has a unique approach. Let’s dive into the details and see which one is better suited for your needs.

Battery & range

  • Bajaj Chetak 3503: Powered by a 3.5 kWh battery, the Chetak offers a claimed range of 155 km, making it an excellent option for longer commutes.
  • TVS iQube 3.4 kWh: With a slightly larger battery of 3.4 kWh, the TVS iQube offers a range of 90 km (Eco mode) per charge—ideal for daily city use but not as far-reaching as the Chetak. Verdict: Chetak wins with a higher range, ideal for longer rides.

Performance

  • Bajaj Chetak 3503: It offers a top speed of 63 km/h, with no official figures for torque or acceleration but still provides a smooth urban ride.
  • TVS iQube 3.4 kWh: The iQube 3.4 kWh offers a higher top speed of 78 km/h with a 33 Nm rated torque and 140 Nm peak torque, making it more performance-oriented. Verdict: TVS iQube offers better top speed and torque, making it a more powerful option.

Charging time

  • Bajaj Chetak 3503: Takes about 3 hours 25 minutes to charge to 80% with an off-board charger.
  • TVS iQube 3.4 kWh: It charges to 80% in 4 hours using the standard charger. Verdict: Bajaj Chetak charges faster despite its slightly larger battery.

Brakes & wheels

  • Bajaj Chetak 3503: Features drum brakes on both ends with 12-inch steel wheels.
  • TVS iQube 3.4 kWh: Comes with a 220 mm front disc brake and 130 mm rear drum brake, mounted on 12-inch steel wheels. Verdict: TVS iQube offers better braking performance with a front disc brake.

Technology & features

  • Bajaj Chetak 3503: Sports a color LCD display, Bluetooth connectivity, and traditional key-based ignition.
  • TVS iQube 3.4 kWh: Boasts a digital display, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, navigation, and smart features such as FallSafe, AutoHold, and more. Verdict: TVS iQube is far superior in terms of smart features, connectivity, and navigation.

Comfort & storage

  • Bajaj Chetak 3503: Provides 35L of underseat storage and a comfortable seat height of 725 mm.
  • TVS iQube 3.4 kWh: Offers 30L of underseat storage, with a seat height of 770 mm and a 157 mm ground clearance. Verdict: Chetak provides more storage and is more suitable for shorter riders.

Design & build

  • Bajaj Chetak 3503: The scooter has a classic retro design with a metal body, offering a premium, durable feel.
  • TVS iQube 3.4 kWh: The iQube features a more modern design with plastic composite bodywork. Verdict: Design preference is subjective, but Chetak’s metal body feels more durable.

Pricing

  • Bajaj Chetak 3503: ₹1,10,000 (ex-showroom)
  • TVS iQube 3.4 kWh: ₹1,37,000 (ex-showroom) Verdict: Bajaj Chetak is more affordable by ₹4,750, making it a more budget-friendly option.

Still undecided? This table breaks down everything you need to know at a glance.

Bajaj Chetak vs TVS iQube 3.4 kWh
Bajaj Chetak vs TVS iQube 3.4 kWh

Choose the Bajaj Chetak 3503 if:

  • You want a longer range for daily commutes
  • You prefer a retro design with a metal body
  • Budget is a key factor

Choose the TVS iQube 3.4 kWh if:

  • You need better performance with higher top speed and torque
  • You prefer modern smart features and better technology
  • You’re comfortable with a slightly higher price tag for added functionality

Both scooters offer strong value, but the Chetak 3503 caters to longer-range riders, while the iQube 3.4 kWh is better suited for tech-savvy urban commuters.